Legal Opinion

James v. Pawsey

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1958No. Civ. 17987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to impress a trust and quiet title to Lots 6, 11, and 12 of Block 5 in the City of Martinez. Plaintiff is the third party donee beneficiary of an agreement made in 1922 by plaintiff’s parents and plaintiff’s aunt on her mother’s side, Laura D. Hollenbeck. The defendant, Esther 0. Pawsey, is another sister of Laura D. Hollenbeck. Defendant claims Lots 6, 11, and 12 as the residuary devisee of the Will of Laura D. Hollenbeck, and asserts the defenses of rescission, laches, and estoppel to the enforcement of the 1922…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of JafemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Spates v. SpatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Van Houten v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. CALIFORNIA STATE AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API