Legal Opinion

Van Houten v. Whitaker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1959No. Civ. 23381PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiffs’ action was one to impose a trust upon one-half of the distributable property in the estate of Clara Haydock, deceased. Prom a judgment declaring such a trust, defendants have appealed. A cross-appeal is prosecuted by all plaintiffs from part of the judgment denying additional relief and by certain of the plaintiffs from such portion of the judgment as decreed that they take nothing under decedent’s will.

The facts may be summarized as follows: Clara and her husband, Leon, had been married for 50 years or thereabouts. Except for a small ranch separately owned by Leon, all their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Stringer v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Stringer's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lich v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Alocco v. FoucheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API