Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Stout

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1961No. 38,299PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

The proceedings here for review arise out of two actions which were consolidated and tried by the district court without a jury to determine the title to real estate in Section 30, Township 129, Range 44 West, Grant County. The first suit was brought by Charley Stout on behalf of his minor son, James William Stout, against Paul Lehman as executor of the estate of Leo Richard Coleman, and resulted in a judgment awarding to James the southwest quarter of the section. No appeal has been taken from the judgment in that action which was entered March 8, 1960.

The second suit is one in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Rye v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. McCulloch v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Robertson Lumber Co. v. Stephen Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Spates v. SpatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API