Legal Opinion
Shane v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 18, 1983No. Congressional Reference No. 1-79PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT1
YOCK, Hearing Officer:
On February 1, 1979, by S.Res. 388, 95th Cong.2d Sess., the Senate referred bill numbered S. 2477, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. to the Chief Commissioner of the U.S. Court of Claims.
The bill which is the subject of this referral is entitled “A Bill for the relief of John L. Shane and Beatrice Rosenus Oakland.” It proposes that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated:
[S]ums owing to John L. Shane and Beatrice Rosenus Oakland, both of Beverly Hills, California, in full satisfaction of all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Deltona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Merchants National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- White Sands Ranchers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Land v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.