Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Newman v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 94-1675PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

This court must decide whether customer companies of temporary service agencies are “employers” subject to claims for violations of specific safety requirements. For the following reasons, we find that they are employers for purposes of VSSR claims. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment which issued a writ of mandamus ordering the Industrial Commission to consider appellees’ VSSR claims.

Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution provides for the granting of an additional award over and above the standard workers’ compensation benefits where the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. MacGregor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Campbell v. Central Terminal WarehouseOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Curry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Zito v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Lyburn Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Precision Steel Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Newman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Stone v. North Star Steel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API