Legal Opinion
Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen and Heilbronner
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 4, 1993No. 79085PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
612 So.2d 1378 (1993)
Marta ESPINOSA, et al., Petitioners,
v.
SPARBER, SHEVIN, SHAPO, ROSEN AND HEILBRONNER, et al., Respondents.
No. 79085.
Supreme Court of Florida.
February 4, 1993.
Fred E. Glickman, Miami, for petitioners.
Jeffrey M. Weissman of Weissman, Lichtman & Dervishi, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Lenard H. Gorman of Lenard H. Gorman, P.A., Miami, for respondents.
McDONALD, Justice.
We review Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen & Heilbronner, 586 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), which involves the following question of great public importance certified in an unpublished order dated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Angel, Cohen & Rogovin v. Oberon Inv., NVSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Lorraine v. Grover, Ciment, Weinstein & Stauber, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- In Re: Blocks' EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Rosenstone v. SatchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Noble v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.