Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson
Kristin Terk Belt and Kimberly Terk Murphy (the Terks) — the joint, independent executors of their father David Terk’s estate — sued several attorneys and their law firm, Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison, & Tate, Inc. (collectively, the Attorneys) for legal malpractice. The Attorneys moved for summary judgment on the ground that estate planners owe no duty to the personal representatives of a deceased client’s estate. The trial court granted the motion, and the court of appeals affirmed the judgment. We hold, to the contrary, that there is no legal bar preventing an estate’s personal…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Paul H. Smith v. Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin DenneyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- lan/stv, a Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. and Stv Incorporated v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Kastner v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Nalle Plastics Family Limited Partnership v. Porter, Rogers, Dahlman & Gordon, P.C. and Patrick P. Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- Shoemaker v. GindlesbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.