Legal Opinion

Rosenstone v. Satchell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1990No. 89-0946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

560 So.2d 1229 (1990)

Rose ROSENSTONE, Appellant,

v.

Harold C. SATCHELL, Appellee.

No. 89-0946.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 4, 1990.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1990.

Harry A. Payton and Luis S. Konski of Payton & Rachlin, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Steven B. Dolchin of Steven B. Dolchin, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellant, Rose Rosenstone, challenges the trial court's order dismissing her complaint against appellee-attorney, Harold C. Satchell, with prejudice. We reverse.

The dismissal appears to be predicated upon a lack of attorney-client privity between Rosenstone…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Angel, Cohen & Rogovin v. Oberon Inv., NVSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen and HeilbronnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Brennan v. RuffnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Dingle v. DellingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Wells v. WellsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API