Legal Opinion

Blair v. Ing

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2001No. 22401PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

Plaintiffs-appellants Leslie Blair and Laurie Bishop (the Appellants), as co-trustees and beneficiaries of the Hughes Family Trust [hereinafter, the Hughes Trust], brought legal malpractice claims against defendant/cross-elaim defendant-appellee Lawrence N.C. Ing, a licensed attorney, and professional malpractice claims against defendant/cross-claimant-appellee Thomas Thayer, a certified public accountant, arising from services rendered in conjunction with the Hughes Trust. Ing moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API