Legal Opinion

Noble v. Bruce

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 21, 1998No. 7, 55, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

The two consolidated cases before this Court, Noble, et al. v. Bruce, No. 7, September Term 1997, and Fauntleroy, et al. v. Blizzard, et al., No. 55, September Term 1997, present the identical issue of whether a nonclient, testamentary beneficiary may maintain a cause of action for professional malpractice against an attorney where it is alleged that the attorney either provided negligent estate planning advice to the testator, or negligently drafted the testator’s will, in a manner which resulted in significant estate and inheritance taxes that could have been avoided.

I

A.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Dow v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  2. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. v. Rummel Klepper & Kahl, LLPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API