Legal Opinion

H.P.A. v. S.C.A.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. Nos. S-197, S-227PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

' FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

H.P.A. (Husband) and S.C.A. (Wife) married in 1974. Two years later, Husband had a vasectomy. The parties were still married when H.P.A., Jr., (Child) was born to Wife in 1978. Despite the arrival of Child under these circumstances, Husband apparently made no special efforts to determine whether he could have fathered Child.

Wife filed for divorce in 1981. In his answer, Husband impliedly admitted he was Child’s father and sought custody of Child. A guardian ad litem was appointed to represent Child’s interests; the court reserved its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Curley v. CurleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Money v. MoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cartee v. CarteeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Tybus v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API