Legal Opinion
Curley v. Curley
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1979No. 3457PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINO WITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, Justices. BURKE, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the superior court erred in refusing to grant appellant’s motion for a reduction in the amount he is required to pay, under a decree of divorce, for child support. We hold that there was no error and affirm.
In 1976, Anthony and Diana Curley were divorced. Under the terms of a stipulation incorporated by reference in the divorce decree, Mrs. Curley was to have custody of the couple’s sons Kevin, born in 1966, and Michael, born in 1962. Mr. Curley was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houger v. HougerAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Mears v. MearsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Severson v. SeversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Hamann v. HamannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Hume v. HumeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hunt v. HuntAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey A. BALLEK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.