Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Arthofer
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1966No. Civ. 8038PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action in eminent domain initiated by the State of California to condemn, for freeway purposes, an unimproved parcel of real property owned by the defendants, Carl Arthofer and Doris Arthofer. Maxwell Wright is not a real party in interest, having sold the subject parcel to the defendants Arthofer prior to the filing of the complaint, and is therefore not involved in this appeal. Defendants appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding them the sum of $35,000 as the fair market value for the taking of the entire parcel.
In October 1961 the aforesaid Maxwell Wright and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Metropolitan Water District v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.