National Rifle Ass'n of America v. Magaw
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE QUESTION OF JURISDICTION
CLELAND, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs’ complaint challenges the constitutionality of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which amends the criminal provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968,18 U.S.C. §§ 921-930. The 1994 Amendments, which went into effect on September 13, 1994, criminalize for a ten-year period most future manufacture, transfer, and possession of semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices. The complaint…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- National Rifle Association Of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Olympic Arms, a Washington Corporation v. Bradley A. Buckles, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Olympic Arms v. MagawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000