Legal Opinion
Olympic Arms v. Magaw
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 2000No. 2:95-cv-76357PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLELAND, District Judge.
I. Background
A. The Statute at Issue
Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit in February 1995, challenging the constitutionality of Title XI of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796 (1994) (“Crime Control Act” or “Semiautomatic Assault Weapons Ban” or “the ban”). The Crime Control Act amended the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 921-930 (“Gun Control Act”). The 1994 Amendments, which went into effect September…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rupf v. YanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Allen v. LeisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Cherri v. MuellerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013