Legal Opinion
Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 3, 1997No. 96-5088PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Federally-licensed firearms manufacturers Navegar, Inc. (doing business as “Intratec”) (“Intratec”) and Penn Arms, Inc. (“Penn Arms”) filed a complaint in federal district court on March 3,1995, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain provisions of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796 (“the Act”), were outside of Congress’ enumerated powers, unconstitutional Bills of Attainder, and vague in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.