Olympic Arms, a Washington Corporation v. Bradley A. Buckles, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.
This action challenges the constitutionality of Title XI of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, commonly referred to as the “semi-automatic assault weapons ban.” It was originally brought by the National Rifle Association, a group of gun manufacturers and retail ers, and a number of individual gun owners. The complaint alleged violations of due process, of equal protection, and of the commerce clause. The district court initially dismissed the action for lack of standing and lack of ripeness. National Rifle Ass’n v. Magaw, 909 F.Supp. 490…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nordyke v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Wilson v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Vilches-NavarreteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Bach v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bach v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.