Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Smith

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1990No. S-3666PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND MOTION FOR AWARD OF AIRFARE AS PART OF COSTS ON APPEAL

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

After reversing the superior coúrt and finding in favor of appellants-intervenors, McCormick v. Smith, 793 P.2d 1042 (Alaska 1990), we awarded appellants $750 for attorney’s fees on appeal, plus costs as yet fully determined. Smith claims that these costs should not be assessed against her because she is a public interest litigant. She points out that the superior court found her to be a public interest litigant when it awarded full…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Falke v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McCormick v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Hickel v. Southeast ConferenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. Citizens for Representative GovernanceAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hickel v. Southeast ConferenceAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API