Legal Opinion

Municipality of Anchorage v. Citizens for Representative Governance

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1994No. S-5616, S-5626PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Three Anchorage School Board (Board) members challenged the validity of petitions to recall them from office. They lost both the case and their elected offices. The superior court ruled that they were public interest litigants, and thus denied the Municipality’s 'motion for attorney’s fees. This appeal followed. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Yes For Recall (YFR) is an unincorporated association formed to organize the recall of Anchorage School Board Members Walter Featherly, Carol Stolpe, Cabot Christianson and Dorothy Cox. Less than 12,000 recall…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. SheehanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. MDC Holdings, Inc. v. Town of ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. v. NoahAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API