Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Smith

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1990No. S-3666PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On or about March 8, 1989, several persons submitted an application to the Dill-ingham City Clerk, Vivian Braswell, for a petition to recall Sally Smith, Shirley Wiggins and Joyce Armstrong from their positions as school board members with the Dillingham City School District. Braswell approved the application, and prepared a recall petition. Enough signatures were then collected, and a recall election was scheduled for May 9, 1989.

Smith, Wiggins and Armstrong filed a complaint against Braswell and the city seeking a court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. WeidnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Tallulah Morgan v. John J. McDonough Boston Home and School Association, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Meiners v. Bering Strait School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mundt v. Northwest Explorations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McCormick v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Chino Mines Co. v. Del CurtoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hopper v. Estate of GoardAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API