Legal Opinion
Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 27, 2014No. 11-456TPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WHEELER, Judge.
On October 9, 2013, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jonathan L. Kaplan’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On November 7, 2013, Mr. Kaplan filed a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The Government filed a response in opposition to the motion, and Mr. Kaplan filed a reply in support. This motion has been fully briefed, and the matter is now ready for decision. For the reasons explained below, Plaintiffs motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Joseph P. Lucia v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, f.s.b. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Diversified Group Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ferguson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Vir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Diversified Group Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.