Legal Opinion

Columbia Venture, LLC v. Richland County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 12, 2015No. Appellate Case 2013-001067; 27563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

Appellant Columbia Venture, LLC, purchased 4,461 acres of land along the eastern bank of the Congaree River in Richland County, intending to develop the property. Columbia Venture knew at the time of the purchase that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was in the process of revising the area flood maps and designating most of the property as lying within a regulatory floodway. See 42 U.S.C. § 4101(e-f) (requiring FEMA to assess the need to revise flood maps every five years). Pursuant to federal law, development is generally not permitted in a regulatory floodway. When Columbia…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braden's Folly, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  2. Long v. State of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Long v. State of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Reyes v. Dorchester County of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API