Agnew v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit for a decree declaring that sections 93.64 and 93.65 of the Electrical Code of Los Angeles (Mun. Code, art. 3, eh. 9, enacted November 12, 1948, effective January 1, 1949) are invalid, and to enjoin their enforcement. Plaintiff had a decree as prayed. Defendants appeal.
Section 93.64 1 provides that every person operating as an electrical contractor, who desires to obtain permits for electrical installations and wiring, shall register and pay "a permit service fee of $100.00 to defray expenses of miscellaneous inspections, reinspections and other services…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Agnew v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In Re GrovesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Desert Turf Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Willingham Bus Lines, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.