Legal Opinion
Woerner v. Brzeczek
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 21, 1981No. 81 C 222PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Janine Woerner (“Woerner”) and Jesse Valles (“Valles”) are Chicago police officers. They bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) alleging two Fourteenth Amendment claims: sexual harassment of Woerner in violation of the Equal Protection Clause and retaliatory acts against both plaintiffs in violation of their First Amendment rights (as incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment). Two other counts assert pendent jurisdiction claims. All defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Patsy Carolyn POE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnie HAYDON, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Hortencia Bohen v. City of East Chicago, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.