Hughes Salaried Retirees Action Committee Peter Formo Richard E. Miller Norman C. Rigby v. Administrator of the Hughes Non-Bargaining Retirement Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents two questions:(1) whether § 104(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4), requires a plan administrator to furnish individual participants upon request with the names and addresses of other plan participants. We hold that it does not because such a list is not an “instrumente ] under which the plan is established or operated,” id,.;(2) whether a plan administrator has a general fiduciary duty under ERISA § 404(a)(1)(A), 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(A),…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Colin v. Marconi Commerce Systems Employees' Retirement PlanDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- McDaniel v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Faircloth v. Lundy Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Mondry v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Doe v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.