Legal Opinion

A. DiCillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1952No. 33133Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

The ultimate question to be determined on this motion is whether a township board of zoning appeals or any of its members as such have any right to appeal from the judgment of a court, rendered on appeal from a decision of such board and reversing and vacating that decision. If they do not, the motion must be sustained.

There appears to be a conflict in the decisions outside this state on the question whether an administrative board, established to review on appeal the decisions of administrative officers, may appeal from a judgment affecting its decision where there is no legislative lan*304guage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lindblom v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Minnis v. Hamilton County Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Gray v. State, Ex Rel. PutnamOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. State v. TancerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API