Legal Opinion

State v. Tancer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1952No. 4622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion for rehearing. The present rules of court do not provide for a motion or application for rehearing. However, the court will give the motion such attention as the contents require.

A different test is applied in determining whether action taken constitutes “an abuse of discretion” or was against the “manifest weight of the evidence.” Steiner v. Custer, 137 Oh St 448; Shearer v. State Medical Board, 58 Abs 561, 564.

This Court recently held that the Board of Liquor Control may appeal an adverse ruling from the Common Pleas Court to the Court of Appeals.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shearer v. State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. DiCillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Piper v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API