Legal Opinion

Minnis v. Hamilton County Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1951No. 7450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, P. J.

The Common Pleas Court reversed the decision of the Hamilton county zoning board refusing an extension of a nonconforming use in county territory. The Hamilton county zoning board instituted this appeal from that order of reversal.

This court, sua sponte, questions the capacity of the appellant to institute the appeal.

Section 3180-1 et seq., General Code, is the enabling act providing for county zoning, and establishing and fixing the powers and duties of county boards of zoning appeals.

Section 3180-14, General Code, provides in part:

“Any party adversely affected by a decision of a county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC. v. KuehnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Bailes v. MartinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Warren v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. A. DiCillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Appeal of Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API