Legal Opinion

Lindblom v. Board of Tax Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1949No. 31598, 31599, 31600, 31601, 31602, 31603, 31604 and 31605PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

It is agreed by all parties to these consolidated appeals that the sole question involved is whether a taxpayer not a party to the proceedings before a county board of revision may, by reason of the provisions of Sections 5609, 5609-1 and 5610, General Code, appeal from the decision of the Franklin county board of revision to the Board of Tax Appeals.

Section 5609, General Code, so far as it affects the question with which we are concerned, provides:

“Any taxpayer may file such complaint as to the valuation or assessment of his own or another’s real property, and the county commissioners, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Middletown v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Village of Amherst v. WraggOhio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Osborn v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. PopeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Waltco Truck Equipment Co. v. City of Tallmadge Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Cooke v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API