Legal Opinion
Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 14, 2004No. CIV.3:01CV7123(AVC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action for damages and equitable relief brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (“Title VII”), and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-60 et seq. The plaintiff, Donna S. Jute, alleges that her former employer, Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (“Hamilton”) subjected her to various adverse employment actions, including job termination, in retaliation for her opposition to sexual harassment in the workplace, for assisting a fellow employee…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donna S. Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., Docket No. 04-3927-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Cody v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Pronin v. Raffi Custom Photo Lab., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Easterling v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Jesep v. NE Health Care Quality FoundDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005