ARATEX SERVICES, INC. v. Blue Horse, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Appellant claims the trial court erred by finding that it failed to disclose a debt pursuant to a garnishment summons and is therefore liable to respondent for the amount of the indebtedness. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Western State Bank and Insurance Agency (the bank) was a major creditor of The Blue Horse, Incorporated (Blue Horse). The bank held a mortgage on real estate owned by Blue Horse and first and second security interests in other Blue Horse assets. On July 12, 1991, the bank started foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage and, a week later,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dataserv Equipment, Inc. v. Technology Finance Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Lundstrom v. HedgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. TomkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Riley Bros. Construction, Inc. v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005