Legal Opinion

First Advantage Background Services Corp. v. Private Eyes, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 5, 2008No. C-07-2424 SCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court is a motion by Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant First Advantage Background Services (“First Advantage”) to dismiss the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh causes of action in Defendant-Counterclaimant Private Eyes, Inc.’s (“Private Eyes” or “PEI”) First Amended Counterclaim. Docket Nos. 32 (“Motion”), 31 (“1st Am. CC”). Private Eyes opposed the Motion, and First Advantage replied. Docket Nos. 41, 42. Having considered the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. White v. J.P. Morgan Chase, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  3. (SS) Quesada v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. (SS) Raymond Richard Prine Jr. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. City of Escondido v. General Reinsurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API