People v. Wheeler
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from Hillsdale; Chester, J. Carl Wheeler' was convicted of violation of the liquor law.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The respondent was convicted under Act No. 381 of the Public Acts of 1913. It was charged in the information that he “did keep, store, and *166possess a certain quantity of vinous, malt, brewed, fermented, spirituous, and intoxicating liquor, to wit, a quantity of whisky, in a room, building, and structure other than the private residence not used as a place of public resort of said Carl Wheeler, and situate at No. 66 North street, in the city of Hillsdale, * * * known as the ‘Union Hotel’ * * * and place of public resort. * * * ”
The Union Hotel, or “No. 66 North street,” is a three-story brick…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Eberle v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People v. GadwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Flower v. WitkovskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Alphonse Lewis, Jr. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Beacon Club v. Kalamazoo County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. StambosvaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. LockhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.