People v. Stambosva
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John),-J. Spyros Stambosva was convicted of violating the liquor law.
1Opinion of the CourtSteeee, J.
The material facts in this case are few and practically undisputed. Defendant ran a retail fruit business in the city of Muskegon, also selling canned goods and vegetables, advertising under the name of the White Front Fruit & Vegetable Company. *438On April 11, 1919, the assistant chief of police of Muskegon made proper sworn complaint on information and belief and obtained a warrant to search defendant’s place of business for intoxicating liquor.. -The officers sent with the search warrant to defendant’s fruit store, which was located on the main business street of Muskegon, found the place in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Booth v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Industrial Bank v. ReichertMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Newberry v. StarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Todd v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.