Legal Opinion
Fitzpatrick v. Liquor Control Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 10, Calendar No. 43,394PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
Plaintiffs are female bartenders in Detroit who filed the instant bill of complaint to enjoin the liquor control commission from attempting to enforce section 19a of the liquor control act * as added by Act No. 133, Pub. Acts 1945 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1945, § 9209-34a. Stat. Ann. 1946 Cum. Supp. § 18.990 [1]). The case was heard by Judge John Y. Brennan on a motion to dismiss which was filed by the defendant commission, and which motion was granted. From the order dismissing their bill of complaint plaintiffs appeal. The motion to dismiss was based on the following grounds:
“1. That the bill of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Verberg v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Bisco’s, Inc v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Diggs v. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.