Legal Opinion

Vanderlinde v. Wehle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1966No. 39872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is a negligence action in which defendant appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The defendant asserts that the verdict is excessive and that prejudicial error occurred during the trial when plaintiff’s counsel allegedly suggested to the jury that insurance was involved.

The plaintiff, Andrew Vanderlinde, and the defendant, Anthony F. Wehle, are first cousins and operate neighboring farms. From the record it appears that at the request of defendant plaintiff went to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Purdes v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook Investment Co. v. Seven-Eleven Coffee Shop, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Anderson v. RumseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Ruppert v. YaegerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Knoll v. NussbaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API