Legal Opinion

Hallada v. Great Northern Railway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1955No. 36,670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Our opinion filed February 25, 1955, *582affirmed the order appealed from if plaintiff within ten days after the filing of the remittitur in the lower court shall file his written consent to a reduced verdict in the sum of $105,000. Hallada v. G. N. Ry. 244 Minn. 81, 69 N. W. (2d) 673. Within the ten-day period plaintiff filed his written consent to a reduction of the verdict. For the reasons given in the previous…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evening Star Newspaper Company v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. State v. LaBarreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Vanderlinde v. WehleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Evening Star Newspaper Company v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API