Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 2013No. CA 12-578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge.

1 Appellants James Bowen and Richard Cagle, doing business as B & C Shavings (B & C), appeal from an order of the Washington County Circuit Court finding no valid contract existed between the parties and awarding damages for unjust enrichment. We affirm, although for different reasons than those set out by the circuit court.

In June 2009, Kendall Gardner approached B & C about purchasing a shavings mill to produce wood shavings for poultry processors. The parties agreed that B & C would build an eight-foot shaving mill for Gardner. On July 13, 2009, B & C faxed an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Quality Optical of Jonesboro, Inc. v. Trusty Optical, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Price v. WillbanksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. City of Marion v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Essential Accounting Systems, Inc. v. DewberryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Sex Offender Assessment Committee v. Wyatt J. CochranCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Washington v. Kingridge Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  4. K7 Design Group, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API