Legal Opinion
Yamie v. Willmott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1939No. 28533PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action by John W. AVillmott and Eulahmae Reed against Willie Yamie to quiet title to an undivided interest in the mineral rights \mder three separate tracts of land. The land involved consists of a 20-acre tract originally allotted to Betsey Canard, a 40-acre tract originally allotted to Nessie Yamie, and another 40-acre tract originally allotted to Yama Larney. The trial court found that plaintiffs were the owners of an undivided three-eighths interest in the mineral rights under the Betsey Canard 20 and an undivided one-lialf interest in the mineral rights under both the Nessie…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Holleman v. CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Perry v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Silmon v. RahhalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Brown v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Nanonka v. Heirs of NanonkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.