Legal Opinion
Silmon v. Rahhal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1936No. 25260PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This ease involves the legality of an order of the county court approving a full-blood Indian conveyance of inherited lands, which deed was one subject to county court approval under section 9 of the Act of Congress of May 27, 1908, as amended by the Act of April 12, 1926, see. 1, 44 Slat, at Large 239. Tlie section as amended is in part as follows:
“* « * j>rovided, that hereafter no conveyance by any full-blood Indian of the Five Civilized Tribes of any interest in lands restricted by section 1 of this act acquired by inheritance or devise from an allottee of such lands shall be valid unless…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolf v. GillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sackett v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Barnett v. KunkelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
- Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Yamie v. WillmottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Christian v. ShidelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Florence Springer v. G. L. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- In Re Leaf's DeedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.