Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kay County; before B. T. Hainer, District Judge. Action by Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. against Thomas J. Dickson. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the' Consolidated Steel & Wire company and the Wichita Plumbing & Pump company, judgment creditors, were cited to appear. Judgment for plaintiffs, and the judgment creditors bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by-
Burpord, C. J.:
This case is before us for the second time. It is reported as Burnham v. Dickson, 5 Okla. 112, 47 Pac. 1059. The object of the action as originally presented was to determine the priority of certain execution and attachment liens. Dickson was a merchant in Kay county, and the Consolidated Steel & Wire company and the Wichita Plumbing & Pump company each obtained judgment against Dickson in the probate court of Kay county on account for goods and merchandise sold to Dickson. Executions were issued on each of these judgments, and delivered to the sheriff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Brown v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Wright v. BachellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Harrington v. HilliardMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Loffland Bros. Co. v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Childs v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ball v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.