Legal Opinion

Ramalingam v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2007No. H030097PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In the underlying marital dissolution action, appellant Suhasini Ramalingam and her husband A.N. Narayanswami jointly retained a neutral accountant, respondent Michael Thompson, to aid resolution of their community property and support issues. During the March 2000 trial on property issues, Thompson testified that only 5,871 of the 55,136 shares of Johnson & Johnson stock acquired by Narayanswami were community property. Based in part on Thompson’s testimony, the trial court ruled that all community shares of Johnson & Johnson stock had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Lambert v. CARNEGHICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. McNair v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Burgueno v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API