Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 2009No. 05FE0006, A131518PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during an inventory of his car. Defendant contends that the applicable inventory policy was overbroad because it required police to inventory the contents of all closed containers, not just those likely to contain valuables. For the reasons expressed below, we agree with defendant, reverse his conviction, and remand for further proceedings.

The facts are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. ConnallyOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State v. BooneOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FulmerOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. Cruz-RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API