Powers v. Holmes
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The plaintiffs sued to' enjoin the sale of certain lots to satisfy an assessment for street work under the Improvement Act of 1911 [Stats. 1911, p. 730] and for the cancellation of bonds based thereon issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 [Stats. 1915, p. 1464]. The defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained and judgment was thereupon rendered in favor of defendants.
The only point involved is whether" the resolution of intention to make the street improvement was sufficient to confer jurisdiction to order the work done. The attack is upon that part of the resolution which,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1865
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Perine v. ErzgraberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Reid v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hansen v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hansen v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928