Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Gladwell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Joseph W. Eaton and another against Thomas J. Q-ladwell to recover for the construction of a building. Erom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

It appears that December 15, 1892, the defendant entered into a written contract 'with plaintiffs for the construction by them of a certain building for defendant. The contract referred to certain plans and specifications which were annexed thereto. The plaintiffs entered upon the work, and on March 10, 1894, notified the defendant that the building was completed according to the contract. No payments, so far as shown by this record, had been made on the contract, and defendant hád not accepted or taken possession of the building. Suit was then commenced by plaintiffs against defendant *446to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. McKibbinMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Fildew v. BesleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Martus v. HouckMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gutov v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Independent Shope Brick Co. v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Pierson v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Germain v. Union School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Ginsberg v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API