Eaton v. Gladwell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Assumpsit by Joseph W. Eaton and another against Thomas J. Gladwell upon a building contract. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs are builders, and have brought this action to recover for the erection of a building for the defendant. The declaration is upon the common counts, and the record states that, “there being no other or further testimony, the jury were permitted to inspect the building,” from which we infer that the substance of all of the testimony is contained in the record.
The plaintiffs, in malting their case, offered in evidence a written contract under which the work was done, and one of them testified that he “claimed it was completed *680according to the contract.” Testimony was offered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schurr v. SavignyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Pennell v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Fildew v. BesleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Black v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Lamb v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Seaside, City of v. RandlesOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Tatro v. Baker-Fisk-Hugill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Otto Misch Co. v. E. E. Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Hapke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.