Legal Opinion
Gutov v. Clark
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error to Wayne; Mayne, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Nathan Gutov and others against Walter H. Clark for breach of a building contract. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The following statement of fact is quoted from brief of counsel for the appellant:
“On May 31, 1913, the three plaintiffs, who are themselves all carpenters and builders, executed a contract with the defendant, by the terms of which the defendant was to furnish all material and erect for the plaintiffs for the sum of $5,800, according to the plans and specifications,-a four-family frame flat building on a lot 40x112 feet owned by the plaintiffs on Crane avenue, Detroit. The plaintiffs deeded this lot to the defendant who was to negotiate a construction loan, and, after the erection of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blakeslee v. HoltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Clark v. Inhabitants of RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- School Directors v. RobersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- Antonoff v. BassoMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Jones v. ElliottNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Baranowski v. StratingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Caradonna v. ThoriousMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Karlinski v. P. R. & H. Lumber & Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.