Ginsberg v. Myers
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Codd (George P.), J. Assumpsit by George Ginsberg and Hyman Parker, copartners as Ginsberg & Parker, against Sam Myers for work done and materials furnished for the plumbing and heating of defendant’s building. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for work done and materials furnished in installing plumbing and heating in defendant’s building. There was a written contract for most of the work and a *150verbal one for extras. Plaintiffs claimed they were prevented by defendant from completing the job and in the circuit they obtained a judgment for the agreed price for the work less what the jury found it would cost defendant to complete the job in accordance with the contract. Defendant claimed he was justified in ordering plaintiffs to quit and that some of their work did not comply with the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Germain v. Union School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Goodsell v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Sheldon v. LeahyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Gross v. CreytsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michigan Electrical Employees Pension Fund v. Encompass Electric & Data, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Falk v. NitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Morgan v. GoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Becker v. Lincoln Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922