Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 10, 2001No. AC 18364PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STOUGHTON, J.

The defendant, William D. Pierce, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of probation and revoking his probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On appeal, the defendant initially claimed that (1) the trial court improperly determined that he violated *210the conditions of his probation because the evidence was insufficient to establish a burglary in the first degree and (2) even if the trial court properly found the defendant in violation of his probation, the court’s revocation of his probation and imposition of a two year sentence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. TreatConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. State v. MayeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. HedgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. OvechkaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API