State v. Ovechka
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant, Paul Ovechka, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because the state did not prove that *681he used a dangerous instrument. We agree with the defendant and, therefore, reverse the judgment of conviction and remand the matter with direction to render judgment of not guilty.2
The following facts and procedural history are necessary for the resolution of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. PratConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OvechkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. OvechkaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. OvechkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. OvechkaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. OvechkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.